![]() ![]() Generally, the observations showed moderate-to-good agreement with the corresponding assessments made from video recordings agreement was the best for large-scale body postures and work actions. Of these, 19 had been compared with some other method(s), varying from expert evaluation to data obtained from video recordings or through the use of technical instruments. Results We identified 30 eligible observational methods. At least two evaluators independently carried out this evaluation. ![]() A systematic evaluation procedure was developed to assess concurrent and predictive validity, repeatability, and aspects related to utility. Methods were included if they were primarily based on the systematic observation of work, the observation target was the human body, and the method was clearly described in the literature. Methods We searched scientific databases and the internet for material from 1965 to September 2008. Objectives This systematic review aimed to identify published observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures in occupational settings and evaluate them with reference to the needs of different users. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |